RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Quantitative and qualitative image quality evaluation of two different dental CBCT scanners. METHODS: Two CBCT systems were evaluated in this study: one small field-of-view (FOV) (50-mm diameter) system that also allows two-dimensional (2D) dental panoramic imaging and one large FOV CBCT system (60-180-mm diameter). These devices were all tested with installed acquisition default modes and proprietary reconstruction software, enabling high-resolution bone imaging. Quantitative analyses were carried out to measure spatial resolution, linearity and homogeneity. Small-size phantoms and a human dry skull were used to evaluate intrinsic performances. Visual qualitative analyses of specific anatomical parts were blindly performed by 10 operators. RESULTS: Concerning spatial resolution, small-voxel size protocols provide equivalent results on the two apparatus. In terms of linearity, all systems are highly linear (0.98 < r2 < 0.99) over the range of signal intensities encountered. Our results, coming from either phantoms or the dry skull, demonstrate that the small FOV CBCT suffers from a lack of homogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: For limited oral and maxillofacial volume imaging (diameter < 50 mm), the polyvalent small FOV CBCT (2D and three-dimensional imaging) system used in this study could reach performances similar to those of the large FOV CBCT.
